![]()
There are many quotes about "truth". A lot of them do not make much sense, or are often just a more or less shallow interpretation of one's own ever changing perception.
Example: "I have always noticed that people will never laugh at anything that is not based on truth." - Will Rogers.Lamer than lame. And that's an opinion. Another one is that the following quotes are all but lame...
Sensible quotes on truth...
On the question: "If someone is telling the truth and no one believes them, is it really the truth?", 94% of the 568 respondents in July 2006 until July 2007 (after that, the forum on youthink.com became silent) answered yes.
What a relief!
Some of the reactions were however quite unsettling. It is a well known and recognised phenomenon, that a large portion of the people who react, do so in the spur of the moment, not thinking through what they are writing. Sometimes they don't even bother to read and comprehend the text completely beforehand. The internet community even thought of a name for such people: "fucktards". Nonetheless, not everybody falls into that category.
Here are the reactions published, reactions to reactions are bundled for easier reading:
| Sure it can be. Just because no one believes them doesn't mean they're not telling the truth. | |||||||
| It's still the truth in my opinion. Everyone thought the sun rotated around the earth even though it was proven that the earth moves around the sun. | |||||||
| what she said | |||||||
| Who are the idiots who clicked 'No'? | |||||||
| that's what I'd like to know as well | |||||||
| Agreed. | |||||||
| It could be... although even if it was, I'd have a hard time believing it if so many people were doubting it. Perhaps the person telling 'the truth' has lied so much in the past that no one can take anything they say seriously anymore. Just a thought. | |||||||
| That's what I was trying to get at ....thanks | |||||||
| but it still is the truth. | |||||||
| lmao cryn out. Why wouldn't it be? | |||||||
| Just because no one believes them doesn't mean they are lying... | |||||||
| Of course it still is. | |||||||
| Of course. The most fundamental example would be math, I think - two plus two will always equal four. | |||||||
| How do you know that? You think it is logical, but it is possible that your logic is just distorted, as is mine. It could equal 3.14 for all you know. Meh. This question is stupid falc! Truth = truth. However, if I were to say that the word 'elicit' means 'To bring or draw out ', and everyone in the world refuted that, and claimed that it meant 'to mimic a pirate', then it would mean 'to mimic a pirate'. That's as close as I can get to making this question work. But then again, as long as I know 'elicit' to mean what it currently does, then that meaning still holds true... even if it's just for me. | |||||||
| And how exactly are you going to explain that? The only thing that could possibly be distorted about that is the system for numbers - that is, what we choose to represent numbers ("two" and "four" in this case) might not be correct. But I just don't see how you can challenge fundamental addition. | |||||||
| The first part of your answer makes me laugh--you dispute the accuracy of logic, and then pin your opinion on the logic of "truth=truth". Anyway, all that is just a question of semantics: the labels we give to things are a linguistic reflection of reality, but not reality itself, if that makes sense. With subjective/objective truth, there is the important distinction between reality and experience. Reality (not just physical...) is there--some of it is always relevant, some of it is sometimes relevant, and some of it is irrelevant to us, but it's all there as truth; the way we experience it through our senses, intuition, imagination, and what we're told, is our understanding. This should reflect truth, but sometimes doesn't: so our understanding of truth doesn't affect truth itself. Idealism that says truth exists in our minds goes against everything else we live within and know. In terms of truth-telling, do you think we have a right to tell lies? The institution of communication essentially exists to pass understanding (existing directly in relation to truth) between one person and another. So lying and treating truth as 'fluid' is so destructive: all of us endowed with the capability to think and speak have the social, if not moral, responsibility to avoid duplicity. | |||||||
| That sure sucks, doesn't it? That was the whole last, say, six months of my marriage. | |||||||
| Sure it is. | |||||||
| I think it depends on whether truth can have many variations, and not just one absolute truth. If it's universal truth, it's the truth. If it's a personal truth, it can vary depending on someone's perspective. If someone strongly believes they are the incarnate of a historical figure, it is their personal truth and what they live their life by, but it is not necessarily accepted by others. | |||||||
| Bullsh*t. What do you mean by their own personal truth? You mean their own personal delusion? Truth and delusion are two very different things. | |||||||
| First, if you call it a delusion you must first know the truth. However, no-one is all knowing, and deciding that something is just a delusion may be a delusion in itself. Truth can be subjective. An instance is "beauty is in the eyes of the beholder". Your opinion of someone else is the truth as you see it, but others may think otherwise, and this does not make your or their judgement inaccurate. Sometimes truth encompasses many variations and are all part of the whole. | |||||||
| Truth isn't subjective. Some things are subjective, because they aren't 'truth'. Like the beauty thing, it's a matter of opinion, not an absolute. | |||||||
| If someone does not think a viewpoint or concept is true, and makes sense, they won't adopt it as an opinion. | |||||||
| Yeah, that's right. Sometimes people are wrong, sometimes we're talking about matters of opinion and not absolutes. Doesn't mean that if everybody believed the earth revolved around the moon, that would become the way things actually are, for an extreme example. | |||||||
| Doesn't mean that if everybody believed the earth revolved around the moon, that would become the way things actually are, for an extreme example.' That's pretty much accurate. Opinion is the thing that alters 'truths'. But these truths aren't absolute truths like whether or not I am 'incarnate of a historical figure' or not. | |||||||
| In case you forgot this - 'If someone strongly believes they are the incarnate of a historical figure, it is their personal truth and what they live their life by, but it is not necessarily accepted by others.' You seem to be backtracking. That's good. It's good to know you've changed your argument to something like beauty being subjective, because it is. I can accept that as a definition for your personal truth. Your initial example is just wrong though. You seem to be accepting this now. | |||||||
| Contrary to popular myth, the truth is not subjective. If something is the way things are, they way something happened no amount of public opinion will make it untrue. | |||||||
| The truth is the truth no matter who believes or doesn't believe. | |||||||
| Yeah it's still the truth. | |||||||
| What is the truth? really. | |||||||
| Yeah, truth is pretty much what the majority of people know as right. | |||||||
| Can be. And it sucks. | |||||||
| Truth is still truth even if no one wants to accept it as truth. | |||||||
| Umm...yeah. | |||||||
| If it's true, yes. | |||||||
| This reminded me of my philosophy class and the Greek character Cassandra. Yes | |||||||
| Of course, why not? | |||||||
| The truth is truth, whether anyone believes it or not. Truth is not based on belief, but by fact. | |||||||
| Well, yeah. I would think so. | |||||||